Dermatological Conditions of the Breast.

There are many dermatologic conditions that can involve the skin of the breast including malignancy, infections, and inflammatory conditions. These are summarized here including presentation and management options.

Evaluation of the Novel 4R Oncology Care Planning Model in Breast Cancer: Impact on Patient Self-Management and Care Delivery in Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Centers.

PURPOSE: Optimal cancer care requires patient self-management and coordinated timing and sequence of interdependent care. These are challenging, especially in safety-net settings treating underserved populations. We evaluated the 4R Oncology model (4R) of patient-facing care planning for impact on self-management and delivery of interdependent care at safety-net and non-safety-net institutions. METHODS: Ten institutions (five safety-net and five non-safety-net) evaluated the 4R intervention from 2017 to 2020 with patients with stage 0-III breast cancer. Data on self-management and care delivery were collected via surveys and compared between the intervention cohort and the historical cohort (diagnosed before 4R launch). 4R usefulness was assessed within the intervention cohort. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 63% (422/670) in intervention and 47% (466/992) in historical cohort. 4R usefulness was reported by 79.9% of patients receiving 4R and was higher for patients in safety-net than in non-safety-net centers (87.6%, 74.2%, P = .001). The intervention cohort measured significantly higher than historical cohort in five of seven self-management metrics, including clarity of care timing and sequence (71.3%, 55%, P < .001) and ability to manage care (78.9%, 72.1%, P = .02). Referrals to interdependent care were significantly higher in the intervention than in the historical cohort along all six metrics, including primary care consult (33.9%, 27.7%, P = .045) and flu vaccination (38.6%, 27.9%, P = .001). Referral completions were significantly higher in four of six metrics. For safety-net patients, improvements in most self-management and care delivery metrics were similar or higher than for non-safety-net patients, even after controlling for all other variables. CONCLUSION: 4R Oncology was useful to patients and significantly improved self-management and delivery of interdependent care, but gaps remain. Model enhancements and further evaluations are needed for broad adoption. Patients in safety-net settings benefited from 4R at similar or higher rates than non-safety-net patients, indicating that 4R may reduce care disparities.

Dense Breasts: What Do Our Patients Need to Be Told and Why?

More than 50 % of states have state-mandated density notification for patients with heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts. Increased breast density carries a risk of masking a cancer and delaying diagnosis. Supplemental imaging is optional and often recommended for certain patients. There are no evidence-based consensus guidelines for screening patients with density as their only risk factor. Breast cancer risk assessment and breast cancer prevention strategies should be discussed with women with dense breasts.

Papillomas of the breast 15 mm or smaller: 4-year experience in a community-based dedicated breast imaging clinic.

PURPOSE: To determine the significance of small, often mammographically occult and asymptomatic papillomas of the breast 15 mm and smaller. METHODS: Four-year retrospective review of papillomas of the breast in a community-based dedicated breast imaging center, with a selected cohort of 179 papillomas 15 mm or smaller in 147 patients, all completing image-guided core biopsy followed by surgical excision. RESULTS: Of 179 papillomas 15 mm or smaller, 36 % were abnormal (24 % atypia; 12 % cancer). Twenty-one percent had a surgical upgrade diagnosis. One hundred forty-six benign papillomas by core biopsy yielded 7 (4.7 %) cancers and 25 (17 %) atypias (atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), or lobular carcinoma-in situ) at surgical excision. Seven of 34 (14 %) of very small papillomas (5 mm or smaller) showed cancer. Twelve of 72 (11 %) and 8 of 36 (13 %) papillomas showed cancer in normal-risk and high-risk patients, respectively. Increasing age (70+ years) associated strongly with increasing risk of papillomas with cancer (10 of 35, 29 %). Thirteen unsuspected papillomas in 10 patients with new nonpapillary breast cancers yielded 3 atypias and 3 additional cancers, changing surgical management in half of these patients. Breast ultrasound identified 44 % of papillomas as incidental findings, all mammographically occult and asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: There is no size threshold below which a papilloma of the breast can be safely watched or ignored without risking a missed diagnosis of atypia or cancer. Identification of papillomas in patients with new nonpapillary breast cancers can change patient management in up to half of these patients. Finally, breast ultrasound significantly enhances identification of unsuspected papillomas.

Surgical site infection after breast surgery: impact of 2010 CDC reporting guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Reported surgical site infection (SSI) rates after breast operations ranges 0.8-26 % in the literature. The aims of the present study were to characterize SSI after breast/axillary operations and determine the impact on the SSI rate of the 2010 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reporting guidelines that now specifically exclude cellulitis. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified 368 patients with 449 operated sides between July 2004 and June 2006. SSI was defined by CDC criteria: purulent drainage (category 1), positive aseptically collected culture (category 2), signs of inflammation with opening of incision and absence of negative culture (category 3), and physician diagnosis of infection (category 4). The impact of excluding cellulitis was assessed. RESULTS: Prior CDC reporting guidelines revealed that among 368 patients, 32 (8.7 %) experienced SSI in 33 (7.3 %) of 449 operated sides. Of these, 11 (33 %) met CDC criteria 1-3, while 22 (67 %) met CDC criterion 4. Excluding cellulitis cases per 2010 CDC SSI reporting guidelines eliminates 21 of the 22 infections previously meeting CDC criterion 4. Under the new reporting guidelines, the SSI rate is 12 (2.7 %) of 449 operated sides. SSI rates varied by procedure, but these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Cellulitis after breast and axillary surgery is much more common than other criteria for SSI, and SSI rates are reduced almost threefold if cellulitis cases are excluded. Recently revised CDC reporting guidelines may result in underestimates of the clinical burden of SSI after breast/axillary surgery.

Microbiology of surgical site infections complicating breast surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) rates complicating breast surgery have ranged from 1-26%, but limited data have been provided regarding pathogen identification and in vitro susceptibility results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of bacterial cultures of breast SSI sites and antibiotic susceptibility testing to determine the clinical utility of these findings. STUDY DESIGN: Medical records were reviewed for SSI in patients who had undergone breast/axillary surgical procedures between June 2003 and June 2006. An SSI was defined by the criteria of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical data were collected on perioperative prophylactic antibiotics, organisms isolated, and resistance profiles. RESULTS: A total of 832 breast/axillary operations in 683 patients were included. Material was available for culture in 67/144 SSI (47%), but cultures were obtained from only 41 of these sites (61%). There were 25 sites with positive bacterial cultures from which 35 organisms were isolated. Staphylococci were the organisms isolated most commonly (n = 21; 60%); 14 other isolates (40%) included gram-negative bacilli and anaerobes. Susceptibility testing was performed on 16 (76%) of the staphylococcal isolates. Ten (63%) exhibited drug resistance; five were multi-drug resistant. Six of eight non-staphylococcal isolates tested (75%) exhibited antibiotic resistance; two were multi-drug resistant. CONCLUSIONS: Although the usual empiric treatment of SSI after breast surgery targets staphylococci, cultures with susceptibility profiles should be obtained because non-staphylococcal bacteria were commonly identified, and drug resistance was seen in more than one-half of the isolates. Further study is needed to define the optimal empiric antibiotic therapy for SSI after breast surgery.

Bacteriologic features of surgical site infections following breast surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs) after breast surgery is common practice. Breast SSIs were investigated to determine bacterial isolates, resistance patterns, and the appropriateness of cefazolin, the authors' institution's current regimen for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS: A retrospective review of 53 patients with culture-positive breast SSIs between June 1997 and August 2008 identified patient characteristics, bacterial isolates, and microbial resistance patterns. RESULTS: Among the 53 patients with positive cultures, 42% (n = 22) had undergone mastectomy, and 34% (n = 18) had undergone lumpectomy. Sixty-three bacterial isolates were identified, with 15% of SSIs being polymicrobial. Of the isolates, 49% (n = 31) were gram-negative bacteria. There was only 1 case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Eight of 63 (13%) gram-negative isolates were cefazolin resistant. CONCLUSIONS: Gram-negative SSIs constituted half of the SSIs in this breast surgery cohort. Of all breast isolates, 17.5% were resistant to cefazolin. On the basis of these findings, antibiotic prophylaxis regimens alternative to cefazolin should be considered.

Complications associated with postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis after breast surgery.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports single-dose preoperative antibiotic (ABX) prophylaxis for breast surgery; however, limited data exist regarding the incidence and type of antibiotic complications postoperatively. METHODS: Breast/axillary surgeries between July 2004 and June 2006 were reviewed. Complications were analyzed by antibiotic group: preoperative prophylaxis, postoperative prophylaxis, and therapeutic intent. The Fisher exact test was used to compare complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 389 patients underwent breast/axillary surgeries during the study period. A total of 363 (93%) patients received ABX: 353 (91%) received a single preoperative dose, 91 (23%) received postoperative ABX prophylaxis, and 76 (201%) received ABX for therapeutic intent. Among patients receiving ABX, 15 (4%) had an ABX-related complication. The ABX-related complication rate was significantly higher among those receiving postoperative prophylaxis (5.5%; 5 of 91) compared with those receiving preoperative ABX alone (0%; 0 of 214) (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Drug-related complications were uncommon with preoperative ABX prophylaxis. Considering the potential complications of ABX after breast surgery, the use of postoperative prophylaxis should be reexamined.

Postoperative prophylactic antibiotics and surgical site infection rates in breast surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: A single preoperative prophylactic dose of an intravenous antibiotic with antistaphylococcal activity is standard of care for breast and axillary surgical procedures. Some surgeons also prescribe postoperative prophylaxis for all patients with drains to prevent infection despite its lack of proven efficacy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with breast and/or axillary surgical procedures between July 2004 and June 2006 were included. Data were collected on patient demographics, procedure types, and use of prophylactic antibiotics. Surgical site infection (SSI) was defined by means of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, including patients meeting the physician diagnosis criterion if an antibiotic was prescribed for a clinical diagnosis of cellulitis. chi(2) and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare SSI rates. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-three patients with 436 surgical sites who received either preoperative or both pre- and postoperative antibiotic were analyzed. Overall, the SSI rate was 7.8% (34 of 436 surgical sites). Eighty-five patients (24%) with 127 surgical sites were provided both preoperative and postoperative prophylactic antibiotics. The SSI rates did not differ statistically (P = .67) for the groups that did (95% confidence interval, 4.8-15.0; 11 of 127 surgical sites, 8.7%) and did not receive postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (95% confidence interval, 5.0-11.0; 23 of 309, 7.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall number of patients who developed SSI was relatively small, there was no reduction in the SSI rate among those who received postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Because of the potential adverse events associated with antibiotic use, further evaluation of this practice is required.

Sclerotherapy for the treatment of postmastectomy seroma.

BACKGROUND: Seroma is a common complication after mastectomy. We review our experience with sclerotherapy for postmastectomy seroma management. METHODS: Patients who underwent outpatient sclerotherapy for postmastectomy seroma were reviewed. Ninety-five percent ethyl alcohol or povidone iodine, which was administered by way of percutaneous catheter, was the initial sclerosant, and dwell time was 20 to 30 minutes. Povidone iodine solution was instilled 2 to 3 times daily. Catheters were removed when output reached <30 mL/d or when cavity size was <20 ml by sinogram. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (18 seromas) had sclerotherapy initiated at median of 34 days after surgery. Mean number of treatment days was 3 (median duration 16). Seven patients (44%) developed infection during treatment, which was associated with increased duration. Three seromas recurred and were successfully treated with single aspiration. COMMENTS: Sclerotherapy is a feasible treatment for chronic seroma after mastectomy. Longer treatment duration was associated with infection; antibiotic prophylaxis should be considered. Research is necessary to determine optimal regimens and superiority over other approaches.